Abstract
Extension of Pareto’s conditions was attempted when N. Kaldor [1939] discussed a change which improved the welfare of some members of the community only at the cost of others. Here was a situation in which Pareto’s principles could not help directly, since if any suffer from a change, welfare comparisons can be made only by involving distributional judgements which Pareto particularly avoided. Unfortunately in practice most economic decisions involve just such combinations of loss and gain; changes which incur only benefits for all members of society are usually undertaken without needing specific economic analysis. Problems arise when gain for one sector of society can be achieved only at the cost of decreased welfare for another.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Suggestions for Further Reading
D. BRAYBROOKE, ‘Farewell to the New Welfare Economics’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 22 (1954–5).
J. R. HICKS, ‘Foundations of Welfare Economics’, Economic Journal, vol. 49 (1939).
N. KALDOR, ‘Welfare Propositions’, Economic Journal, vol. 49 (1939).
J. R. QUIRK AND R. SAPOSNIK, General Equilibrium Theory and Welfare Economics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968).
T. SCITOVSKY, ‘A Note on Welfare Propositions in Economics’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 9 (1941–2).
D. M. WINCH, ‘Consumer’s Surplus and the Compensation Principle’, American Economic Review, vol. 55 (1965).
D. M. WINCH, Analytical Welfare Economics (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971).
Copyright information
© 1977 Catherine M. Price
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Price, C.M. (1977). The Compensation Principle. In: Welfare Economics in Theory and Practice. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15739-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15739-6_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-19838-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15739-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)